Can the Law Save the Planet?

Posted on: January 8th, 2026 by Alan Wareham

Synopsis

(The focus paper is available to DOWNLOAD HERE)

Climate change law has emerged as a critical legal discipline in response to the global climate crisis. Unlike traditional laws that impose penalties for wrongdoing, these laws set obligations for governments and organisations to reduce carbon emissions and limit global warming to well below 2°C. Over 3,000 laws and regulations now exist worldwide, forming a framework for climate governance.

Rooted in international environmental law, climate change law began with the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992), followed by the Kyoto Protocol (1997) and the landmark Paris Agreement (2015). The Paris Agreement introduced flexible, legally binding elements, requiring nations to submit and update Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) every five years, report progress transparently, and mobilise $100 billion annually for climate finance. It also mandates global stocktakes and adaptation planning, aiming to align financial flows with low-carbon development.

National legislation complements these efforts. For example, the UK’s Climate Change Act 2008 set binding emission targets and established oversight mechanisms. Courts have increasingly enforced climate obligations, as seen in Urgenda v Netherlands, where the government was ordered to cut emissions by 25% to protect human rights. Similarly, the Swiss Senior Women case (2024) marked the first international ruling that state inaction violates human rights. Other notable cases include Ogale and Bille v Shell, highlighting corporate accountability, and the West Cumbria Mining judgment, which reinforced stricter environmental assessments.

Despite progress, challenges persist enforcement gaps, political resistance, and unequal capacities among nations. Critics argue climate laws can impose economic burdens, threaten sovereignty, and face practical limitations. Supporters emphasise accountability, global cooperation, and moral responsibility to future generations, asserting that legal frameworks drive innovation, protect ecosystems, and prevent irreversible harm.

The debate centres on whether climate law should reflect ethical duties to future generations and if legal systems can capture these dimensions. While laws provide stability and enforceability, they must balance economic realities with intergenerational justice. Ultimately, climate change law is a cornerstone of global sustainability, translating scientific urgency into actionable policy and fostering international solidarity in the fight against climate change.

Question posed

“To what extent should climate change law reflect moral obligations to future generations, and can legal frameworks adequately capture the ethical dimensions of environmental stewardship?”

  • This question invites discussion on:
  • Intergenerational justice
  • The limits of legal systems in addressing moral duties
  • Whether laws can or should be shaped by ethical principles rather than economic or political interests

What to Expect

The Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum is a space where serious ideas meet joyful exploration. Whether you are a seasoned philosopher or a curious newcomer, our discussions are designed to foster a spirit of open-minded inquiry. We prioritize respectful dialogue, intellectual curiosity, and the shared pursuit of understanding over adversarial debate. This is philosophy as it should be—dynamic, inclusive, and profoundly engaging.

Practical Details

(The focus paper is available to DOWNLOAD HERE)

Note on Attendance: Due to the popularity of these events, places are often fully booked. If you reserve a ticket but later find you cannot attend, we kindly ask that you cancel promptly to allow others the opportunity to join.

A History of Pies and Puddings

Posted on: November 20th, 2025 by Editor-Jo

Food historian Neil Buttery (author of The Philosophy of Puddings and Knead to Know: A History of Baking) explores the history of some of our most beloved British foods: pies and puddings, from their origins on the top tables in medieval meals to the present day, where they are beloved by many (and treated with suspicion by some).

In the Middle Ages, Britain used to have a great tradition of baking huge pies – called coffyns and pasties – filled with whole joints of venison and wild boar. There were large luxurious mince pies too, filled with expensive exotics and plenty of meat, but these fancy pies all pale in comparison to the humongous and rather grotesque Yorkshire Christmas Pye of the Georgian era, filled with the bounties of the northern landowners sent by horse and carriage to their city friends.

The history of puddings is much more convoluted – the simple question of ‘what is a pudding?’ is a surprisingly difficult one to answer: black pudding, haggis, jam roly poly, steamed treacle sponge, trifle, ice cream – how can all of these be puddings? Then there is the added complication of any dessert or afters also called ‘pudding’. The pudding has gone through quite an evolution since its humble origins as a mixture of blood and fat boiled in intestines.

Neil will also present some of his research on regional foods: there’s a regional pudding associated with almost every region of England, why did such a proliferation of regional puddings occur and what does this tell us about the origins of some of our most beloved regional and national pies and puddings: Manchester pudding will, of course be represented, plus Yorkshire pudding (and the fact it’s not from Yorkshire), Cornish pasties (and the fact they’re not from Cornwall) and haggis (and the fact it’s not Scottish). Bombshells these may be – but they tell us much more about the social history of food and how foods become associated with particular places and quickly integrated into the cultural landscape of a region or country.

Refreshments (mulled wine, mince pies, tea, coffee and soft drinks) will be available for an additional cost. Please select the appropriate ticket type when making your booking.

Is Philosophy Progressive

Posted on: September 18th, 2025 by Alan Wareham

This Philosophy Forum is based on a paper I came across in the journal ‘Philosophy Now’ which caught my interest. As a scientist myself (doctor – medical) I have been fascinated by the many new discoveries over the years, particularly in the last century or so, and even more so since the advent of computers, the internet and mobile phones. In medicine huge progress has been made, with diagnostic tests and effective treatment of diseases, along with prevention of many common illnesses and infections. ‘Progress’ is very visible to all.

So, when I saw the title ‘Is Philosophy Progressive?’ I wanted to look into this further – in other words, ‘progress’ can be viewed philosophically in many different ways. Or is the whole subject of ‘Philosophy’ just asking similar questions, but getting many different answers, depending on your point of view, and the views of eminent philosophers? Or does ‘philosophy’ just go round in endless circles, rather than ‘progressing’ (some sceptics may take that view..)?

The debate has been raging for centuries, from at least the time of Galileo, but there is always (and always will be) scope to look at both old and new issues in different ways – and aspects. Indeed, as with many debates, what do we actually mean by ‘progress’ – after all, many new scientific inventions have not always led to positive outcomes. Just look at the state of the world now, with wars and conflicts using new tools of destruction, not even imagined a few decades ago.

About the Session

This illuminating session will be led by Dr Susan Hilton. To enrich your experience, we highly recommend reading Dr Susan Hilton’s thought-provoking focus paper in advance. This resource will provide valuable context and enhance the depth of our collective exploration.

What to Expect

The Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum is a space where serious ideas meet joyful exploration. Whether you are a seasoned philosopher or a curious newcomer, our discussions are designed to foster a spirit of open-minded inquiry. We prioritise respectful dialogue, intellectual curiosity, and the shared pursuit of understanding over adversarial debate. This is philosophy as it should be; dynamic, inclusive, and profoundly engaging.

Practical Details

  • Pre-Event Preparation: The focus paper can be Downloaded Here.
  • Note on Attendance: Due to the popularity of these events, places are often fully booked. If you reserve a ticket but later find you cannot attend, we kindly ask that you cancel promptly to allow others the opportunity to join.

So, come along and present your point of view – or you can just absorb the discussion around you

Should We Permit Voluntary Assisted Dying?

Posted on: June 5th, 2025 by Editor-Jo

Euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending a person’s life to relieve suffering. Assisted suicide is the act of deliberately assisting another person to kill themselves. The English courts have wrestled with challenges to the restrictions on euthanasia and assisted suicide for years, while the government has resisted calls to liberalise the law. Meanwhile, terminally ill people continue to travel overseas to clinics such as Dignitas, to end their lives. Assisted dying raises fundamental questions about respect for individual autonomy, protection of the vulnerable and the role the State should play. This lecture will explain the law and explore arguments for and against liberalisation.

Quakerism

Posted on: May 12th, 2025 by Alan Wareham

In an era increasingly defined by ideological division, social turbulence, and environmental instability, how do we reclaim a sense of purpose, direction, and connection? The Religious Society of Friends—commonly known as Quakers—offers a profound and enduring response: a way of being that transcends dogma and invites us into a practice of spiritual clarity, ethical integrity, and transformative community discernment.

Quakerism is not a rigid doctrine but a lived experience—a journey of listening deeply, living authentically, and bearing witness to the divine spark within all people. Rooted in the powerful stillness of silence yet dynamically committed to meaningful action, the Quaker tradition provides a countercultural model of resilience and hope in an ever-changing world.

About the Session

This illuminating session will be led by Bobby Mears, who brings a wealth of insight to the practice and philosophy of Quakerism. To enrich your experience, we highly recommend reading Bobby’s thought-provoking focus paper in advance. This resource will provide valuable context and enhance the depth of our collective exploration.

What to Expect

The Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum is a space where serious ideas meet joyful exploration. Whether you are a seasoned philosopher or a curious newcomer, our discussions are designed to foster a spirit of open-minded inquiry. We prioritize respectful dialogue, intellectual curiosity, and the shared pursuit of understanding over adversarial debate. This is philosophy as it should be—dynamic, inclusive, and profoundly engaging.

Practical Details

  • Pre-Event Preparation: The focus paper can be downloaded here.
  • Note on Attendance: Due to the popularity of these events, places are often fully booked. If you reserve a ticket but later find you cannot attend, we kindly ask that you cancel promptly to allow others the opportunity to join.

Join us as we delve into the Quaker way of life—a practice of listening and living that offers timeless wisdom for navigating the complexities of our modern age.

The Problem of Evil

Posted on: February 19th, 2025 by mlpEditor

One of the biggest challenges to Christian faith is a seemingly simple question: If God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and perfectly good, why does evil exist? This Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum explores this fundamental question and examines how Christian thinkers have tried to answer it.

We will examine three key aspects of this problem:

The Logical Challenge: Can evil and the Christian God exist at the same time, or does this create an impossible contradiction? We’ll explore four main responses from Christian thinkers:

  • Divine Justice: The idea that suffering exists as a necessary consequence of human sin, starting with humanity’s first wrong choices
  • Freedom of Choice: The argument that God values human free will so highly that He allows for the possibility of evil choices
  • Character Development: The view that facing difficulties helps develop human virtues like courage and compassion, preparing us for a better afterlife
  • Ultimate Purpose: The belief that, despite appearances, everything serves a greater good in God’s plan

The Amount of Suffering: Even if we accept that evil and God can coexist, why is there so much suffering in the world? Is the amount of pain we see really necessary? We’ll examine whether the above arguments adequately address this question.

Animal Suffering: How do we explain the suffering of animals, who aren’t moral agents making free choices? We’ll look at how Christian thinkers have tried to make sense of this particularly challenging aspect of the problem.

 

This seminar will encourage attendees to think critically about these deep questions while examining both historical and contemporary perspectives on the problem of evil.

The session will be presented by Andrew Bailey, and there is a focus paper written by Andrew that we recommend reading in advance to enable you to get the most out of the discussion.

 

Good to know: We take pride in putting the fun back into serious philosophy through our friendly and respectful discussions involving different levels of experience of philosophy.  The Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum is all about collectively exploring interesting and exciting ideas from different viewpoints … not winning arguments!

 The focus paper for reading in advance of the session, can be downloaded here.

 We are usually oversubscribed, so if you book but find out later that you cannot attend, please cancel your ticket to free up a place for someone else. Thank you.

Crime and Punishment – Is Justice Just?

Posted on: December 3rd, 2024 by mlpEditor

How should society respond to crime? This engaging seminar will explore fundamental questions about justice, punishment, and the role of the state.

Together, we’ll examine:

The moral and legal foundations of punishment: What gives a state the right to punish its citizens?

Current debates in criminal justice: From prison overcrowding to debates about sentencing guidelines, we’ll discuss real-world challenges facing our justice system.

Prevention versus punishment: Should we focus more on addressing the root causes of crime or on strengthening enforcement and sentences?

 

Whether you’re interested in philosophy, criminal justice, or current affairs, this discussion will offer valuable insights into one of society’s most pressing challenges.

The session will be presented by Dr Susan Hilton, and there is a focus paper that we recommend reading in advance to enable you to get the most out of the discussion.

 

Good to know: We take pride in putting the fun back into serious philosophy through our friendly and respectful discussions involving different levels of experience of philosophy.  The Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum is all about collectively exploring interesting and exciting ideas from different viewpoints … not winning arguments!

 The focus paper for reading in advance of the session, can be downloaded here.

 We are usually oversubscribed, so if you book but find out later that you cannot attend, please cancel your ticket to free up a place for someone else. Thank you.

Is Atheism a religion?

Posted on: October 14th, 2024 by mlpEditor

Atheists tend to advocate the belief that there are no deities. In Western society Atheism seems to have increased in popularity as measured by census reporting and development of groups advocating a Humanist approach. However, this does raise the question of where Atheism sits in relation to religion.

How successful are atheists in moving us on from religion?  Is Atheism developing into a religion of its own?

In this Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum we will investigate aspects such as ‘what is religion?’, the differences and similarities between Theism and Atheism, and what the moral questions are that are resulting from a shift to an Atheist-based society – if that is actually the case.

The session will be presented by David Leaver, a retired priest who wrote the focus paper and who also hosts the regular podcast, ‘Church Ahead’. David will utilise his life experiences from working within the Christian Church whilst also taking a broader perspective looking at other approaches to collective approaches to modern society.

David refers to A.C Grayling’s 2023 Manchester lecture on Atheism in his paper and this can be viewed on YouTube here.

Everyone will be encouraged to become actively involved and given an opportunity to discuss their views.

 

Good to know: We take pride in putting the fun back into serious philosophy through our friendly and respectful discussions involving different levels of experience of philosophy.  The Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum is all about collectively exploring interesting and exciting ideas from different viewpoints … not winning arguments!

 The focus paper for reading in advance of the session, can be downloaded here.

 We are usually oversubscribed, so if you book but find out later that you cannot attend, please cancel your ticket to free up a place for someone else. Thank you.

What should Higher Education be for and how should it be funded?

Posted on: August 28th, 2024 by mlpEditor

As we ease into a new educational year, questions linger about how we should approach education in general and Higher Education in particular. Some universities are voicing concerns that they can’t make ends meet and the recent pressure to reduce foreign students is only adding to the financial challenges they face.

The Blair government set the objective for the UK to have at least 50% of its people attend university and obtain a degree, but the question remains on whether this political objective still holds true. Should education be a right for all? And at what level should the cost be transferred from the state to the individual? If you don’t enter Higher Education, why should you pay for those that do?

This Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum will investigate the current problems faced by all those involved with Higher Education, leading into philosophical discussions around topics such as how does the UK benefit from Higher Education; who should it be aimed at; is education a Human Right; and what are the general benefits of education in the first place?

The session will be presented by Manchester Lit and Phil member Richard Remelie, who wrote the focus paper. We will give everyone an opportunity to discuss their views.

 

Good to know: We take pride in putting the fun back into serious philosophy through our friendly and respectful discussions involving different levels of experience of philosophy.  The Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum is all about collectively exploring interesting and exciting ideas from different viewpoints … not winning arguments!

The focus paper for reading in advance of the session, can be downloaded here.

 We are usually oversubscribed, so if you book but find out later that you cannot attend, please cancel your ticket to free up a place for someone else. Thank you.

Generative AI: If you can’t beat ‘em…

Posted on: July 30th, 2024 by mlpEditor

In November 2022, OpenAI made the now famous ChatGPT tool available for public use and the company has since enjoyed a swift and pervasive rise in popularity.

The use of this tool and others like it is unnervingly ubiquitous. ChatGPT’s extremely helpful tendrils have been welcomed with open arms, into all areas of life – whether we are active users or unknowing consumers of its generated content. ChatGPT can claim authorship of everything from glowing end-of-year school reports to disgruntled letters of resignation. And now it can add a Manchester Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum Focus Paper to that list (!).

The paper contains a discussion with ChatGPT in which the tool is used to explain ChatGPT itself, its pitfalls, strengths and the philosophical questions surrounding it (please see download link below). We’ll be using this to guide our conversations in the session, which will be presented by Manchester Lit and Phil member Robert Mears.

 

Good to know: We take pride in putting the fun back into serious philosophy through our friendly and respectful discussions involving different levels of experience of philosophy.  The Lit & Phil Philosophy Forum is all about collectively exploring interesting and exciting ideas from different viewpoints … not winning arguments!

The focus paper for reading in advance of the session, can be downloaded here.

We are usually oversubscribed, so if you book but find out later that you cannot attend, please cancel your ticket to free up a place for someone else. Thank you.

Sign up to our newsletter

Sign up to our e-newsletter to receive exclusive content and all the latest Lit & Phil news

* indicates required